The Doctor’s Advocate | First Quarter 2020
Government Relations Report

Maternal and Child Health: When Public Health Objectives Become Legislative Priority

Remi Stone, Esq., Regional Director, Government Relations

Safe, healthy pregnancy and quality postpartum care for new mothers and their infants have been discussed in the public health policy arena for decades. Public policy in general—and public health policy specifically—address broad physical and sociopolitical environments. When public health policy interventions enter the legislative arena and become law, they have the potential to affect entire populations.

Advancing public health policy involves an interplay among physician organizations (such as medical and specialty societies), entities interested in supporting quality medical practice (such as The Doctors Company), nonprofit organizations, and elected and appointed officials. We frequently coordinate with medical societies when we advocate to ensure that legislation is effective in helping physicians treat patients and improve access to care without unduly interfering in the doctor-patient relationship or increasing physician liability.

To those in the healthcare field, it may seem obvious that improving patient care, preventing adverse outcomes, and setting the stage for a healthy life are essential public policy goals. Nevertheless, with so many interests competing for state legislators’ attention, it is difficult to engage a broad base of legislators to work on public health issues. The result is that, traditionally, important matters such as maternal and child health have not been elevated as a top-tier issue.

Elevating public health matters—including maternal and child health—to make them a priority for legislators is an ongoing challenge. An analysis published in the Journal of Public Health Management and Practice found that “public health research is often not well translated for policy audiences. Furthermore, researchers seeking to influence policy face an incomplete understanding of what influences legislators’ decisions regarding which issues will receive their limited time and focus.”

Fortunately, organizations like The Doctors Company, along with medical and specialty societies and nonprofits, work to fill this gap by employing professionals who understand how to translate complex policy ideas into meaningful conversations with legislators.

State legislators have considerable authority over which health interventions are funded, implemented, and evaluated. The Journal of Public Health Management and Practice study concluded: “Because legislators value constituents’ opinions, it is critical to inform and educate constituents about public health issues….”

Educating the public (i.e., constituents) can be expensive and take many years, but a long-term advocacy vision seems to be paying off. Efforts by many organizations have helped educate the public and elevate maternal and child health to a top-tier public policy issue for legislators in many jurisdictions across the nation and in Washington, DC. Organizations include the March of Dimes, with its goal to improve the “health of all moms and babies”; the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which identified maternal mortality as a top policy focus in 2018; and the American Public Health Association, which works to improve the health and well-being of all women, children, and adolescents.

Legislators appear to be listening to their constituents, who may face hospital closures in rural areas and dwindling access to obstetric care. These factors, coupled with public education, are feeding the interest of elected and appointed policymakers.

We are seeing an increased legislative interest in maternal and child health policy in our advocacy work. In 2019 alone, over 900 pieces of state and federal legislation were introduced on maternal and infant health policy—from establishing maternal mortality review committees (e.g., Arkansas House Bill 1440) to funding programs that implement care models that can result in successful maternal and infant health outcomes (e.g., Washington House Bill 2077).

A cache of on-topic bills is passing into law. For example, Illinois passed a bundle of maternal and child health policy bills into law—including HB 2433, a new law that requires hospitals to have the proper instruments for taking a pregnant woman’s blood pressure; HB 2895, which mandates yearly training in obstetric hemorrhage for all providers of obstetric medicine and includes a broader policy to implement initiatives to improve birth equity and reduce peripartum racial and ethnic disparities; and HB 3511, a mandate that birthing hospitals must provide information on maternal mental health.

The trend is expected to continue into 2020 as numerous bills introduced in state legislatures across the nation point to expanded interest in maternal mortality review committees, obstetric hemorrhaging protocols, continuing education requirements for birthing facilities personnel, birth equity initiatives, and scope of practice. The Doctors Company will continue to work on these issues to help our members deliver quality care to their patients and advance the practice of good medicine. We will continue to keep you informed about ways that upcoming legislation might affect you and your practice.

Learn More

Visit our Legislative, Regulatory, and Judicial Advocacy page for in-depth Advocacy Updates and an interactive map that lets you track legislation in your state.


Resources

Dodson EA, Stamatakis KA, Chalifour S, Haire-Joshu D, McBride T, Brownson RC. State legislators’ work on public health-related issues: what influences priorities? J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):25-9.

Improving maternal health. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Maternal and child health. American Public Health Association.

Policies and positions. March of Dimes.


The Doctor’s Advocate is published by The Doctors Company to advise and inform its members about loss prevention and insurance issues.

The guidelines suggested in this newsletter are not rules, do not constitute legal advice, and do not ensure a successful outcome. They attempt to define principles of practice for providing appropriate care. The principles are not inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods reasonably directed at obtaining the same results.

The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any treatment must be made by each healthcare provider considering the circumstances of the individual situation and in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction in which the care is rendered.

The Doctor’s Advocate is published quarterly by Corporate Communications, The Doctors Company. Letters and articles, to be edited and published at the editor’s discretion, are welcome. The views expressed are those of the letter writer and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or official policy of The Doctors Company. Please sign your letters, and address them to the editor.

First Quarter 2020

An Ounce of Prevention
Analysis of Medical Oncology Claims

Government Relations Report
Maternal and Child Health: When Public Health Objectives Become Legislative Priority

Foundation News
Foundation Supports Study on Clinician Burnout

Member-Exclusive Program for Practice Managers

The Back Page
Industry and Company News

See more issues

Choosing a malpractice insurer?
Here’s what to ask.

Selecting a medical malpractice insurer is one of the most important decisions you’ll make. This guide outlines what to look for in an insurance company.