Although the Internet provides a plethora of useful information, it becomes problematic when patients post unfavorable opinions about physicians and/or their services. It can be difficult to prevent negative comments from being posted to social media sites. It can be equally difficult to obtain a retraction or have a negative comment removed once it has been posted.
Even if you can find the source of the negative comments and persuade the person to stop, existing comments remain in the public domain and might even be perpetuated by others inadvertently or intentionally.
It is not advisable to respond to negative comments in a defensive manner. A defensive response generally solicits another negative comment from the person who posted the initial comment—which creates a war of words that only escalates the situation. In addition, specifically acknowledging that this individual is your patient may conflict with state and federal privacy laws. If you respond to a negative comment, use general, nondefensive language, as in the following example:
In accordance with state and federal privacy laws, Dr._____ is precluded from commenting in public or on social media sites specifically regarding a patient’s treatment. However, Dr._____ is available to discuss concerns directly with the patient in order to achieve a satisfactory resolution. Patients are welcome to contact Dr._____’s office.
The Doctors Company frequently receives requests from members asking for information on how to hold patients accountable for posting negative comments.
If you are considering pursuing a defamation suit, you might need to retain private counsel to assist you. Proving damages and recovering them from a former patient can be a difficult and expensive undertaking.
Keep in mind that many lawyers are not interested in prosecuting these types of claims. Both federal and state courts have repeatedly held that individuals and Internet Service Providers are protected by the First Amendment in exercising their right to free speech.
Some physicians hire reputation management companies. The companies might promise to remove negative posts, but this claim can be misleading. It is more likely that the search engine results will be manipulated to move the posts further down in the result pages, rather than have the negative posts completely removed.
One study indicated that 88 percent of the comments posted about physicians are positive.1 The remaining 12 percent may appear disproportionately hurtful and vindictive, but negative feedback also creates an opportunity for a physician to become a better practitioner or improve the practice.
Consider conducting your own research to determine how the negative comments have affected the practice. Have patients left the practice? Is the patient load decreasing? Do patients call about or comment on the negative posting? Answering these questions will provide reliable evidence to help you determine if there are areas within your practice that could be improved.
For more about blogs and rating and review sites, read “The Internet: Friend or Foe to Physicians.”
A sample patient satisfaction survey is provided on our Patient Safety page.
Avoid potential liability risks associated with new technologies by visiting our Electronic Health Record and Telemedicine Resource Center.
The guidelines suggested here are not rules, do not constitute legal advice, and do not ensure a successful outcome. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any treatment must be made by each healthcare provider in light of all circumstances prevailing in the individual situation and in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction in which the care is rendered.