Prescription theft and abuse is a real and growing problem, making it imperative for physicians to protect themselves and their practices. In addition, a recent court ruling spotlights potential obligations to third parties when prescribing medications to patients. Together, these developments signal the need for vigilance and security in your prescribing practices.
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has developed federal and state regulations to safeguard prescribing practices. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) also requires that prescription pads have security features to prevent copying, modifying, and counterfeiting. Currently, a majority of the states have passed legislation to implement operational Prescription Monitoring Programs (PMPs), which seek to curtail prescription drug abuse and diversion through highly effective tools and strategies developed for use by government officials.
Physicians can incorporate electronic prescribing, or e-prescriptions, into their practice to protect themselves against diversion. Electronic prescribing promotes efficiency and reduces medical liability—two objectives of the HITECH Act. It eliminates the time-intensive process involved with tracking paper prescriptions, voids opportunity for alterations, and provides a direct connection to pharmacists to ensure accurate prescriptions.
Physicians who continue to use paper prescriptions should implement protocols with local pharmacies to manage prescription theft, forgery, and alteration. Consider these risk management tips:
Physicians may also consider terminating the physician/patient relationship with a patient who is involved in prescription abuse, theft, or diversion.
If prescription fraud occurs, physicians should investigate and notify local law enforcement, the local DEA office, and the necessary state licensing and medical boards. Physicians should also contact their malpractice insurer to discuss other reporting requirements and further safeguards for preventing diversion.
Recently, the Utah Supreme Court ruled that third parties may sue doctors for injuries caused by a patient whose actions are associated with alleged medication mismanagement.
The ruling allowed relatives to sue a physician and his staff after a patient killed his wife. According to the American Medical Association, “The court ruled that when potential risks might outweigh potential benefits for a given activity, doctors must consider the potential effects their actions could have on third parties.”
While state laws differ, courts in several other states have issued similar rulings. As a result, health professionals in Utah and other jurisdictions may be found to have a legal responsibility to third parties when prescribing medicine to patients—which will likely impact the way medicine is practiced.
The guidelines suggested here are not rules, do not constitute legal advice, and do not ensure a successful outcome. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any treatment must be made by each healthcare provider in light of all circumstances prevailing in the individual situation and in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction in which the care is rendered.