

History
California’s Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) was enacted in 1975 in response to skyrocketing judgments, drastic increases in malpractice insurance premiums, and diminishing access to health care. That year, two malpractice insurance companies made major announcements: one notified 2,000 Southern California physicians that their insurance would not be renewed, and the other notified 4,000 Northern California physicians that their premiums would increase by 380 percent.
These companies had determined that the California medical malpractice insurance market had become too risky and unstable for financially sound underwriting. The number of claims had increased by 200 percent in a 10-year period, and the dollar amounts awarded in judgments or settlements had increased 1,000 percent in 10 years.
MICRA’s Major Provisions
- A cap of $250,000 on noneconomic damages (i.e., pain, suffering, loss of consortium)
- Disclosure to the jury of collateral sources of payment (other sources of health insurance payments for the same injury)
- Limits on attorney fees
- Periodic payments for future damages
- A requirement that plaintiffs give a 90-day warning of an impending claim to the provider so that the provider has a chance to settle the claim out of court
- A strengthened physician discipline system
Proven Benefits
Lower premiums—At the time MICRA was enacted, California’s malpractice insurance rates were among the highest in the nation; today, California rates are among the lowest. More health care professionals now carry liability insurance because coverage is available, and the premium rates are affordable.
Improved access to care—MICRA strikes a balance, encouraging the availability of health care while also providing for compensation to injured patients. Self-insured public institutions provide health care to hundreds of thousands of patients who do not have health insurance. By containing costs, MICRA maintains the availability of funds to serve those who could not otherwise afford health care, while injured patients are fairly compensated.
Earlier and more equitable settlements—Fewer malpractice cases go to trial now than in the era before MICRA. MICRA’s provisions promote earlier and more equitable settlements. Fewer frivolous lawsuits now go to trial (although many meritless actions are still filed).
Preserving MICRA
A Model for National Reform
What You Can Do
More Information About MICRA















